thechilli media platform for entrepreneurs and startups in the high-tech and media industries, including university and corporate spinouts, venture capital and angel funding, and government - all in the chilli thechilli media platform for entrepreneurs and startups in the high-tech and media industries, including university and corporate spinouts, venture capital and angel funding, and government - all in the chilli

Editorial

Due Diligence

Markets

Dialogue

Profiles

Speaker's Corner

Tough Tales

Trade Secrets & Tips

Uncle Thakur

Benchmarks & Definitions

EVENTS

What's NEW!

Entrepreneurship: the journey continues

European VCs poised for resurgence in 2006

Letter to The Chancelor

Fabless demise greatly exaggerated

The global patent

SFLG: banks’ investment criteria must be transparent

Editorial

Entrepreneurship: the journey continues

Letter to The Chancelor

Fabless demise greatly exaggerated

UK’s SBIR campaign gathers steam, but still a long way to go

Taming the lions: Farleigh’s trade secrets for successful investments

SFLG: readers reply

Small firms loan guarantees (SFLG)

‘Walking dead VCs’?

Technology entrepreneurs should consider moving to Liverpool

European skills mobility

London gets its own technology fund

Can start-ups compete directly with the giant gorillas?

DTI invites bids for US-style SBIC funds with a Ł200m pot

New advisory board gives further impetus to Enterprise Capital Fund

San Francisco chosen as HQ for stem cell research

Checking the technology VC pulse

New deck chairs at the Department of Trade and Industry

Angel funding starts to slowly roll again

Reader’s letters

Start-ups form the bedrock of new biotech industry and jobs

European VC overhang hits $10.5 billion

Warning for the European software industry

UK microelectronics research

Self-certification

Startups should note: manufacturing

Nano hype exposed

Disruptive technologies

Investors & NDAs

Standards-based startups

Startup management

Startup seed capital

Archives...

Due Diligence

DiBcom

picoChip secures new VC fans and $20.5 million R3 funding

Esmertec IPO postponed

Smartdot

update: PicoChip

Elmos

Sarantel (update)

Innova Card (update)

Inside Contactless

Ignios

Innova Card

Pulsic update

Anthropics

Sarantel

Pulsic

Phyworks

Antenova

Artimi

Archives...

Markets

European VCs poised for resurgence in 2006

Global VC trends

Major company law overhaul

Durham Scientific Crystals

UK R&D

Differentiating between corporate spin-outs/carve outs/corporate venturing

VC investment slows in Q2 2005

First half Israeli high-tech venture capital rises by 15%

The US SBIR and its relevance to the UK

UK technology VC investments fall by 17% in 2004

EMV (chip + PIN): show us the money?

Digital cinema gets a kick-start

Early stage deals and IPO activity up

VC misconceptions

MMS

Music industry Pt2

Music industry Pt1

VCs ready for growth?

UWB Pt2

UWB Pt1

SIP IV - solutions

SIP III - midlife crisis

SIP II - challenges

SIP I - layoffs

Java alphabet soup?

Wi-Fi: bubble or bonanza?

Archives...

Dialogue

Gregory K. Hinckley

Robin Saxby

Walden Rhines

Simon Davidmann

Profiles

David Srodzinski

SiGe pioneer joins semiconductor start-up

Richard Farleigh

Simon Davidmann

Gary Kildall

Walter Herriot

John Laurie

Amaratunga, CamSemi

More...

Speakers Corner

SFLG: banks’ investment criteria must be transparent

Why software patents are important for early stage companies

Software Patent absurdity

Why the UK could imitate the US SBIR program

Regional Venture Capital Funds

Let’s encourage entrepreneurs

Vantage from Silicon Valley

Storm Troopers

Bridging the finance gap

Frustrated entrepreneur

Board membership

Business - uni review

Startup attributes

Hell revisited

University spinouts

Archives...

Tough Tales

Acuid in administration

MBO blues, part two

MBO blues, part one

Destructive acquisitions

The road to CEO hell

Trade Secrets & Tips

The global patent

Trademarks

Steve Jobs

Investor presentations

Law firm pioneers fixed legal fees for investment solution

Top start-up tips from Mike Baker

How trade mark law deals with metatags and adwords

Innovation separate to R&D

Understand the global company

Patents

The Elevator Pitch

Attracting staff

Consultants

Press releases

Follow-ups

Product demonstrators

Billion $ markets

Impressing investors

Strategic alliances

Startup spirit

Targeting N. America

The founding team

Incubate your idea!

Archives...

Uncle Thakur

10 - the prospect, the channel

9 - Partnering

8 - Product development

7 - Stock options

6 - Building the team

5 - The term sheet

4 - Pinning down the plan

3 - Seeds of excess

2 - Dinner brainstorm

1 - Drive-by-IPO

Benchmarks & Definitions

High-tech

Media

Chilli Domain Definitions™

Chilli Value Test™

Chilli Startup Definitions™

Chilli Pages Classifieds

Archives


Banner2.gif

First half Israeli high-tech venture capital rises by 15%


Capital raised in Q2 2005 reaches $387 million – up 11% from Q1.

Advertisement

According to a quarterly survey carried out by IVC (Israel Venture Capital) Research Centre in association with Israel Venture Association (IVA), 98 Israeli high-tech companies raised $387 million from venture investors – both local and foreign (chart 1). The amount was up 11 percent from the $350 million raised by 102 companies in the previous quarter and was 14 percent higher than the $338 million raised by 91 companies in the second quarter of 2004. In the first half of 2005, capital raised was $737 million, up 15 percent from the first half of 2004 levels.

Zeev Holtzman, chairman of IVC and Giza Venture Capital, said, “The 15 percent increase in capital raised by Israeli high-tech companies in the first half reflects continuousness of the high level of activity in the Israeli high-tech sector. We foresee stability in H2/05 that will bring us to approximately $1.5 billion in capital raised for the full year.“

In Q2, the average company financing round was $3.9 million, an increase of six percent from the previous quarter and 15 percent from the second quarter of 2004. Sixty-two companies attracted more than $1 million in Q2. Of these, 11 companies raised more than $10 million each, and 10 companies raised between $5 million and $10 million each.

In Q2/05, Israeli VC funds invested $163 million in Israeli companies, a decrease of six percent from Q1/05, but five percent more than in Q2/04 level. The share of Israeli VC funds in the total amount invested in Israeli high-tech was 42 percent. The remainder of capital invested was mainly from foreign sources and also from other Israeli VC investors.

Capital raised by sector (chart 2)
The communications sector led the second quarter and H1/05 in fund raising.
Twenty-four communications companies attracted $136 million, 35 percent of the total amount raised in the quarter compared with 34 percent in the previous quarter and 36 percent in the second quarter of 2004.
In H1/05, communications companies raised $256 million, 35 percent of the total capital raised in the period.

Life science companies followed the communications sector both in Q2 and H1/05 with about one-fourth of the total capital raised. Efrat Zakai, director of research at IVC, commented, “The software sector, which raised only $32 million in the second quarter, continues to slip from its traditional position as the second most attractive Israeli sector.”

Capital raised by stage
Thirteen seed companies raised $22 million (six percent of the total raised) in Q2/05, compared with $32 million (nine percent) in Q1/05, and $17 million (five percent) in Q2/04. Three semiconductor firms accounted for $10 million of the investment in seed companies, while two Software firms raised $6.8 million. During H1/05, Seed companies attracted seven percent of the total funds, compared with 4.5 percent in H1/04.

In Q2/05, mid-stage companies dominated capital raising as they have for the past three years. Forty-five mid-stage firms raised $197 million, 51 percent of total capital raised. The mid-stage share held fairly steady during H1/05 with 51 percent of the total, compared with 52 percent in H1 2004.

Chart 1: Capital raised by Israeli high-tech companies by quarter ($m)

Chart 2: Capital raised by Israeli high-tech companies by sector (%)

For more information: www.ivc-online.com


© Chilli Publishing Ltd 2005

19JUL2005

High-tech


© Chilli Publishing Ltd 1999-2005