thechilli media platform for entrepreneurs and startups in the high-tech and media industries, including university and corporate spinouts, venture capital and angel funding, and government - all in the chilli thechilli media platform for entrepreneurs and startups in the high-tech and media industries, including university and corporate spinouts, venture capital and angel funding, and government - all in the chilli

Editorial

Due Diligence

Markets

Dialogue

Profiles

Speaker's Corner

Tough Tales

Trade Secrets & Tips

Uncle Thakur

Benchmarks & Definitions

EVENTS

What's NEW!

Entrepreneurship: the journey continues

European VCs poised for resurgence in 2006

Letter to The Chancelor

Fabless demise greatly exaggerated

The global patent

SFLG: banks’ investment criteria must be transparent

Editorial

Entrepreneurship: the journey continues

Letter to The Chancelor

Fabless demise greatly exaggerated

UK’s SBIR campaign gathers steam, but still a long way to go

Taming the lions: Farleigh’s trade secrets for successful investments

SFLG: readers reply

Small firms loan guarantees (SFLG)

‘Walking dead VCs’?

Technology entrepreneurs should consider moving to Liverpool

European skills mobility

London gets its own technology fund

Can start-ups compete directly with the giant gorillas?

DTI invites bids for US-style SBIC funds with a Ł200m pot

New advisory board gives further impetus to Enterprise Capital Fund

San Francisco chosen as HQ for stem cell research

Checking the technology VC pulse

New deck chairs at the Department of Trade and Industry

Angel funding starts to slowly roll again

Reader’s letters

Start-ups form the bedrock of new biotech industry and jobs

European VC overhang hits $10.5 billion

Warning for the European software industry

UK microelectronics research

Self-certification

Startups should note: manufacturing

Nano hype exposed

Disruptive technologies

Investors & NDAs

Standards-based startups

Startup management

Startup seed capital

Archives...

Due Diligence

DiBcom

picoChip secures new VC fans and $20.5 million R3 funding

Esmertec IPO postponed

Smartdot

update: PicoChip

Elmos

Sarantel (update)

Innova Card (update)

Inside Contactless

Ignios

Innova Card

Pulsic update

Anthropics

Sarantel

Pulsic

Phyworks

Antenova

Artimi

Archives...

Markets

European VCs poised for resurgence in 2006

Global VC trends

Major company law overhaul

Durham Scientific Crystals

UK R&D

Differentiating between corporate spin-outs/carve outs/corporate venturing

VC investment slows in Q2 2005

First half Israeli high-tech venture capital rises by 15%

The US SBIR and its relevance to the UK

UK technology VC investments fall by 17% in 2004

EMV (chip + PIN): show us the money?

Digital cinema gets a kick-start

Early stage deals and IPO activity up

VC misconceptions

MMS

Music industry Pt2

Music industry Pt1

VCs ready for growth?

UWB Pt2

UWB Pt1

SIP IV - solutions

SIP III - midlife crisis

SIP II - challenges

SIP I - layoffs

Java alphabet soup?

Wi-Fi: bubble or bonanza?

Archives...

Dialogue

Gregory K. Hinckley

Robin Saxby

Walden Rhines

Simon Davidmann

Profiles

David Srodzinski

SiGe pioneer joins semiconductor start-up

Richard Farleigh

Simon Davidmann

Gary Kildall

Walter Herriot

John Laurie

Amaratunga, CamSemi

More...

Speakers Corner

SFLG: banks’ investment criteria must be transparent

Why software patents are important for early stage companies

Software Patent absurdity

Why the UK could imitate the US SBIR program

Regional Venture Capital Funds

Let’s encourage entrepreneurs

Vantage from Silicon Valley

Storm Troopers

Bridging the finance gap

Frustrated entrepreneur

Board membership

Business - uni review

Startup attributes

Hell revisited

University spinouts

Archives...

Tough Tales

Acuid in administration

MBO blues, part two

MBO blues, part one

Destructive acquisitions

The road to CEO hell

Trade Secrets & Tips

The global patent

Trademarks

Steve Jobs

Investor presentations

Law firm pioneers fixed legal fees for investment solution

Top start-up tips from Mike Baker

How trade mark law deals with metatags and adwords

Innovation separate to R&D

Understand the global company

Patents

The Elevator Pitch

Attracting staff

Consultants

Press releases

Follow-ups

Product demonstrators

Billion $ markets

Impressing investors

Strategic alliances

Startup spirit

Targeting N. America

The founding team

Incubate your idea!

Archives...

Uncle Thakur

10 - the prospect, the channel

9 - Partnering

8 - Product development

7 - Stock options

6 - Building the team

5 - The term sheet

4 - Pinning down the plan

3 - Seeds of excess

2 - Dinner brainstorm

1 - Drive-by-IPO

Benchmarks & Definitions

High-tech

Media

Chilli Domain Definitions™

Chilli Value Test™

Chilli Startup Definitions™

Chilli Pages Classifieds

Archives


Banner2.gif

European VC overhang hits $10.5 billion


Although the total amount of new VC funds raised in Europe has been lacklustre and averaging around $1.2 billion per year, the amount of uninvested VC funds (referred to as overhang) has grown substantially to hit $10,493 million, according to figures released by VentureOne, a unit of Dow Jones. The firm surveyed 90 funds raised since 1999 by European-headquartered venture capital and corporate investors.

Advertisement

The data suggests that half the overhang amount is due to bubble era funds: 13% of 1999 funds, 18% of 2000 funds and 30% of 2001 funds remain to be invested. Those years were the largest venture capital fund-raising years on record in Europe, and together represent €5.4 billion, over 50% the overhang.

In comparison, the overhang of US venture capital funds is $53.6 billion - or €41.8 billion - but U.S. firms have raised considerably larger venture capital funds. Comparing the percentage remaining, the numbers are similar. In the US, about 20% of 2000 funds and 33% of 2001 funds remain unspent, although only 5.5% of 1999 funds remain unspent.

“Considering the slowdown in venture capital fund-raising over the past two years in Europe, the overhang of European capital could be exhausted much quicker than in the US,” said Steve Harmston, director of international research for VentureOne. “That being said, the venture capital investment level in Europe currently remains at a much slower pace - about €3.5 billion annually, or one-fifth the rate of US investment - which means there is still a considerable pool of money outstanding that could be used to support both new startups and follow-on investments in existing portfolio companies.”

As expected, the younger the funds, the higher the percentage that remains to be invested. Remaining unspent are about 53% of the funds raised in 2002, 64% of the amount raised in 2003 and 86% of the amount raised in 2004.

Overall, venture capital fundraising in 2004 was €1.3 billion, a drop from the €1.5 billion raised in 2003. Fund-raising in Europe has been on a decline since 2000, when €13.6 billion was raised in venture capital funds.

The Chilli perspective The overhang figures create a great perception dilemma for new startups, which have difficulty in raising any S2, S3, R1 funds (see definitions), and negative perception problems for VCs. This is created because VCs are hanging on to portions of their vintage funds for follow on investments with their existing portfolio companies.

Although this is standard practice in the industry, the portion of overhang is too high. For example, $1.9 billion from the year 2000 still remains uninvested. So what is the point in raising new funds if existing funds have not been allocated or invested yet? Some VCs are concerned that they may not be able to raise any new funds that can be used to meet their existing commitments and therefore hanging on to what remains. The old chestnut about not finding sufficiently talented management teams in which to invest will not wash anymore, as competitive funds start showing positive results – note some of the recent IPOs and trade sale exits.

It wouldn’t be so bad if the total IRR from some of these vintage funds were above average, but some limited partners may be wondering ‘what is the point of risking and committing such capital if the total returns are no different than the average interest rate from bank deposits?’

Meanwhile, several new promising startups in Europe are calling it a day, due to severe lack of seed stage and early stage funds. Although the debate about the so-called equity gap continues unabated, no concrete solutions have been proposed or executed. Given this scenario, it is understandable why so many technology entrepreneurs in Europe feel frustrated and stifled. Let the brain drain begin in earnest.


Comments on this story? Send an email to the editor at Editor@TheChilli.com

© Chilli Publishing Ltd 2005

18APR2005

Support The Chilli

Learn more about The Chilli

Subscribe to The Chilli RED





COPYRIGHT




© Chilli Publishing Ltd 1999-2005
About Us | Register | Media Kit | Events | Back to top